Alterations On An Idea

Rovy suggested a non-proposal for a non-session at AECT. I don’t want to fully reject the idea, but it seems to contradict the idea I had in first suggesting a session. If “the only publicity is through blogs” we virtually invite ourselves to keep preaching to the choir. The point of having a session was to bring the discussion to those who are not participating in the blogosphere. After reading the post on the AECT news blog I am thinking that perhaps we should contact the Radical Thinkers of Penn State to see if we could learn from their experience or possibly even enlist their help. Back to Nate and Rovy. . .

Rovy suggested a non-proposal for a non-session at AECT. I don’t want to fully reject the idea, but it seems to contradict the idea I had in first suggesting a session. If “the only publicity is through blogs” we virtually invite ourselves to keep preaching to the choir. The point of having a session was to bring the discussion to those who are not participating in the blogosphere.

After reading the post on the AECT news blog I am thinking that perhaps we should contact the Radical Thinkers of Penn State to see if we could learn from their experience or possibly even enlist their help.

Back to Nate and Rovy. . .

2 Comments

  1. I was being a bit facetious! It’s a serious topic but it does not mean we should not take some time to have a little fun 🙂

  2. I agree that we can have a little bit of fun with a serious topic. Besides, facetious or not the idea of a non-session may have some merit because it highlights the non-mainstream status of blogs but could show off the mainstream value of blogging.

Comments are closed.